Wednesday, 2 December 2009

Fear and anxiety

One of my favourite quotes is by Dan Gardner (Risk. The Science and Politics of Fear, 2008) who said that "we are the healthiest, wealthiest, and longest-lived people in history. And we are increasingly afraid. This is one of the great paradoxes of our time."

This manifests itself in a number of ways. I am bothered by how many times I hear statements such as "we have had legal advice and we can't...". This bothers me particularly when it stops us from giving advice that we genuinely believe to the correct advice based on experience and the best knowledge at our disposal.

An example of this emerged after the terrible bushfires we had here in Victoria last February. I read about one local council that said they wanted to put in bunkers in their community but didn't because they could not indemnify themselves against any future claims. Leaving aside whether we think bunkers are a good idea in bushfire prone areas, what we seem to have here is a council that believes they are the best protection for their residents - but who can't or won't put them in because of the legal/insurance problems that they might cause.

While I understand their reticence, I am concerned that they felt they were unable to implement a policy that they felt provided the best protection for their residents because of what a court might do in the future.

This approach is now entrenched as the default position. Decisions made not based on what the best policy is in a given situation, but on whether the decision maker can shift the risk to someone else - and in this context I am talking about legal risk (liability) not actual risk.

When and how did this happen? It is all pervasive and I suspect it has snuck up on us.

I want to be clear that I am not advocating recklessness here - but the pendulum has swung too far in seeking to apportion blame for every accident and incident in society. Yes we want to learn from mistakes that are made and where it is proved that negligence caused the incident then yes there should be consequences. But when we as a society become afraid to do what we believe to be right because we are so concerned with being legally liable - then we have surely gone too far.

Friday, 10 July 2009

Are we raising our children to be frightened?

I was recently in the airport waiting to fly home when I heard a mother yell at her daughter, who was about 5 years old, "don't wander away or you will get snatched (kidnapped), kids get snatched all the time you know". The child had moved about 2 metres away from her mother and the comments really grated on me. Maybe we have always invoked the bogeyman to get our children to do what we want them to - but I am not sure it is either effective or appropriate.

Apart from this not being true (kids getting snatched all the time that is) - it did make me think about how much we as a society focus on fear. This is particularly important for us in Victoria after the tragic bushfires of 7 February this year.

With the experts telling us that climate change means we can expect more extreme weather events in the future, there is the very real possibility that we may have a public loss of confidence in the bush. If this leads to even more people staying at home on their PlayStation's or Nintendo instead of getting outside then I think the long term consequences will far outweigh the actual risk of being outdoors in nature.

To respond to this heightened anxiety we will need to focus on the benefits that come from being involved in outdoor programs, while at the same time being able to demonstrate that as an industry we have responded to the changing environment and that we have taken all reasonable steps to ensure our programs are safe and that we have reviewed and revised our programs accordingly.

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

I am home

Well I have arrived safely back in Australia (a couple of weeks ago) and I am at the stage now that when I wake up I don't wonder what city I am in - I am home.


I had a great trip to Canada - what a beautiful country - and then on to New England for a short visit - more beautiful countryside and Autumn colours. The hospitality we encountered was first class and I had the opportunity to meet and learn from lots of wise and knowledgeable colleagues while we were there.


I know look forward to opportunities to share what I learned to our colleagues in Australia and hopefully we can implement a number of the ideas we have picked up.


I even bought some cookies from a young woman working for the Obama campaign in New Haven and so I feel that I made a contribution to his election.
I also couldn't resist the chance to get myself involved in a debate between Republicans and a lone, but quite passionate, Democrat in New York. That is me on the left of the photo in my 'Mystic Journey' tee shirt.
The 'Mystic Journey' was a bit of a theme for me for the whole trip - I bought the tee shirt in Vancouver in Stanley Park at the start of the trip and used it to remind myself to try to stay 'in the moment' throughout - to fully listen to what I was being told and to learn as much as I could - hopefully I was able to do that at least most of the time.

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

Day Camps, Montreal



We also visited day camps in Montreal at the Bio Dome and the Montreal Botanic Gardens.


The Bio Dome (above right) is like a zoo and they run a range of activities around animal themes and conservation. The campers complete conservation projects and learn about eco systems and biodiversity.


At the Montreal Botanic Gardens campers also undertake projects around themes like geology, plants or insects.

They even have an opportunity to plant and tend their own veggie garden over the 7 week Summer program. They then harvest and take home the produce.

Base de Plein Air le P'tit Bonheur


This camp was founded by the Jesuits in 1962 and is on 1700 acres with 6 lakes (I am convinced it is illegal in Canada to open a camp without at least one beautiful lake.)
They use tee pee accommodation and log cabins and are in the process of trying to raise $24million over 5 years to upgrade the camp.
They have a range of programs focused on young people who have dropped out of school to try to get them to go back to school.
These campers spend 2 weeks at school learning skills like cooking or maintenance and then come to camp for 2 weeks to put those skills into practice.

Base de Plein Air Perce-Neige, Quebec

Our host at this camp was Yanik Villeneuve or Kuma (the Bear in Japanese). This camp was opened in 1977 and is owned and supported by the Canadian Tire Foundation (Canadian Tire is like Bunnings in Australia.)



This is part of the gang at left after our morning hike to the lookout.

They run a range of programs for people with a disability and disadvantaged groups, as well as school programs and Summer camp for 8-15yo.

The foundation is made up of the 94 stores in Quebec who each contribute a percentage of their profits to the foundation.

It would be great if we could get the level of involvement with the corporate sector that they have in Canada.

Sunday, 5 October 2008

More about germs

In relation to my last post I found this little item for sale in my airline magazine:
"A personal germ eliminator" which apparently uses portable UVC light to kill 99.99% of germs. They recommend you use it to sterilise telephones, keyboards, bathroom services (I assume this is the dunny seat!), hotel pillows, kitchen utensils and more - now come on!